Regenerative & orthobiologic
Practices already working with biologics who want a source that stands up to scrutiny from a well-informed patient.
Regenerative medicine has a credibility problem, and it was earned. The market is full of material with no characterisation, no traceable source and no science behind the claims on the box. A clinic that wants to operate at a higher standard has had very little to choose from.
We are not trying to sign every clinic. Provider numbers are limited by territory, and the review is genuine — the wrong provider damages the brand for every other provider in the network.
Practices already working with biologics who want a source that stands up to scrutiny from a well-informed patient.
Clinics whose patients are already spending at the top of the market and expect the science to justify the price.
Programmes built around biological age, where the age of the material itself is the entire argument.
Practices tracking the follicle and secretome research, positioned for the topical programme as it becomes available.
Clinics serving athletes and demanding patients where provenance and documentation are non-negotiable.
Groups running IRB-supervised protocols who need characterised, traceable, consistent material.
A four-minute application covering your practice, licensure, specialty and intended use. Reviewed by a person.
We verify licensure and standing, and discuss the regulatory environment you operate in. Some applications are declined here.
Your clinical team completes handling and documentation training with the scientific liaison assigned to your account.
Territory is confirmed, your provider account opens, and the first shipment is scheduled.
Every clinic reading this has been pitched by someone who promised more than they could support. So here is the boundary, stated before you apply rather than after.